MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097657140 · doi:10.1002/jms.4676

Top–down lignomics analysis of the French oak lignin by atmospheric pressure photoionization and electrospray ionization quadrupole time‐of‐flight tandem mass spectrometry: Identification of a novel series of lignans

2020· article· en· W3097657140 on OpenAlexaff
Abanoub Mikhael, Travis D. Fridgen, Michel Delmas, Joseph Banoub

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mass Spectrometry · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMass spectrometryElectrospray ionizationTandem mass spectrometryPhotoionizationProtonationElectrosprayIonizationChemical ionizationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Fragmentation (computing)LigninIonChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report herein the top-down lignomic analysis of virgin released lignin (VRL) extracted from the French oak wood using atmospheric pressure photoionization quadrupole orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometry (APPI-QqTOF-MS) (+ ion mode). Eight major protonated lignin oligomers were identified using the APPI-QqTOF-MS/MS of this complex VRL mixture without any kind of purification. This series of protonated oligomer ions were identified as neolignan cedrusin (1), five different aryltetralin lignans dimers (2-6), one lignan-dehydroshikimic acid complex (7), and a lignan trimer (8). Similarly, electrospray ionization (ESI)-QqTOF-MS (+ ion mode) allowed us to identify three extra aryltetralin lignan derivatives (9-11). The Kendrick mass defect analysis was used for the simplification of this complex APPI-QqTOF-MS into a compositional map, which displayed clustering points of associated ions possessing analogous elemental composition. This series of novel protonated molecules were selected and subjected to low-energy collision-induced dissociation (CID)-MS/MS analyses. The obtained gas-phase fragmentation patterns helped to tentatively assign their most likely structures. Also, it was found that the use of different APPI and ESI ambient ionization techniques enhances the ionization of different types of lignin oligomers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mass SpectrometrySame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207