MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097749890 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2020.10.013

Pulmonary Vein Stenosis After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Insights From the ADVICE Trial

2020· article· en· W3097749890 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Michelle Samuel, Paul Khairy, François‐Pierre Mongeon, Jason G. Andrade, Sophie Gomes, Zurine Galvan, Rukshen Weerasooriya, Paul Novak, Isabelle Nault, Thomas Arentz, Isabel Deisenhofer, George D. Veenhuyzen, Pierre Jaı̈s, Ratika Parkash, Atul Verma, Syamkumar M. Divakara Menon, Helmut Püererfellner, Christophe Scavée, Mario Talajic, Peter G. Guerra, Léna Rivard, Marc Dubuc, Katia Dyrda, Bernard Thibault, Blandine Mondésert, Rafik Tadros, Julia Cadrin‐Tourigny, Martín Aguilar, Jean‐Claude Tardif, Sylvie Lévesque, Denis Roy, Stanley Nattel, Laurent Macle

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de QuébecRoyal Jubilee HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreUniversité de MontréalSouthlake Regional Health CenterMontreal Heart Institute
FundersBiosense WebsterCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMichael Smith Health Research BC
KeywordsMedicinePulmonary vein stenosisAtrial fibrillationCardiologyInternal medicinePulmonary veinAblationStenosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207