MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097860441 · doi:10.1190/geo2019-0806.1

Interpolated multichannel singular spectrum analysis: A reconstruction method that honors true trace coordinates

2020· article· en· W3097860441 on OpenAlexaff
Fernanda Carozzi, Mauricio D. Sacchi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpolation (computer graphics)AlgorithmGridComputer scienceSingular spectrum analysisFilter (signal processing)Convergence (economics)TRACE (psycholinguistics)Singular value decompositionMathematicsGeometryArtificial intelligenceComputer visionImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The multichannel singular spectrum analysis (MSSA) reconstruction algorithm denoises and reconstructs seismic traces on a regular grid. We have developed a modified version of MSSA that can cope with denoising and reconstruction of traces with irregular coordinates. The proposed method, interpolated multichannel singular spectrum analysis (I-MSSA), connects off-the-grid observations to the desired gridded data via a linear interpolation operator. The algorithm consists of two steps. In the first step, we use the steepest-descent method to estimate the gridded data that honors off-the-grid observations. The second step guarantees convergence to a solution by applying the MSSA filter to the gridded data. The final solution is the reconstructed volume that honors off-the-grid observations. We use the algorithm to process synthetic and field data. We also provide an application in which 3D prestack data corresponding to an orthogonal survey are fully reconstructed using cross-spread gathers. We use I-MSSA to restore each subset individually. The output is a complete seismic volume described in a regular common-midpoint grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.679

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207