Adaptive Lp-Norm Regularized Sparse Representation for Human Activity Recognition in Coal Mines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to overcome the lack of in-depth exploration into the intrinsic geometry of human activities. For this purpose, a generalized adaptive Lp-norm regularized sparse representation (ARSR) approach was proposed for human activity recognition, which preserves the model adaptability through the adaptive Lp-norm regularization. In essence, the proposed method applies sparse representation to human activity recognition, turning it into a new optimization problem. In addition, the problem was solved by the iterative-shrinkage-thresholding algorithm. Specifically, the sparse representation learned by the ARSR algorithm was introduced into the support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Then, several experiments were conducted on coal-mining datasets for human activity identification. The experimental results revealed that the proposed algorithm is superior to the current sparse representation algorithms like the standard L1-norm regularized sparse representation algorithm. The research findings shed new light on the human activity recognition in coal mines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it