MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3097960162 · doi:10.5604/01.3001.0014.3814

Karl Ove Knausgård’s Bluntness in My Struggle

2020· article· en· W3097960162 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTekstualia · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAutobiographical and Biographical Writing
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenunciationNarrativeClosenessOpposition (politics)Repetition (rhetorical device)ShameLiteratureLinguisticsPsychoanalysisArtPhilosophyPsychologySocial psychologyPoliticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article examines Karl Ove Knausgård’s My Struggle, especially its fi rst volume A Death in the Family, with respect to the writer’s use of a discourse of bluntness in his autobiographical narrative for the purpose creating meaningful art. Such a form of art is developed in opposition to knowledge. The author’s renunciation of knowledge enables a special kind of relationship with the reader through expressions of closeness or shame; the reader witnesses the process of Knausgård’s becoming, rendered through narration, repetition, and accumulation. My Struggle is characterized by a unique way of conveying an honest autobiographical, engaging the reader and opening up new possibilities for literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it