MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098149900 · doi:10.3390/s20226527

Ka Band Holographic Imaging System Based on Linear Frequency Modulation Radar

2020· article· en· W3098149900 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Meng, Chuan Lin, Jiefeng Zang, Anyong Qing, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTerahertz technology and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersSouthwest Jiaotong UniversityFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)RadarComputer scienceImage resolutionExtremely high frequencyHolographySpatial frequencyCalibrationModulation (music)MillimeterPlanarOpticsRemote sensingComputer visionElectronic engineeringAcousticsPhysicsEngineeringComputer graphics (images)TelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Millimeter wave (MMW) technology is expanding rapidly into security screening for dangerous items concealed under clothing. It uses safe non-ionizing radiation and penetrates clothing well. We present a new planar system at Ka band for the three-dimensional simultaneous imaging of both sides of an inspected person where the images are produced in real time by a recently proposed generalized holographic reconstruction algorithm. Low-cost linear frequency modulation (LFM) radar technology is used along with a simple but efficient method for system calibration. Experimental characterization of the spatial resolution and the sensitivity of the system prototype has been carried out. It is established that the achieved spatial resolution is 6 mm or better if the item is not obscured by clothing and it may deteriorate to 7 mm depending on the clothing hiding the item. The spatial sensitivity is confirmed to be at least 2 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicTerahertz technology and applicationsFrench-language works237,207