MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098233720 · doi:10.5376/ijms.2020.10.0007

Temporal Variations of Micro Benthic Assemblage in the Sangu River Estuary, Bangladesh

2020· article· en· W3098233720 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Begum Prianka, Md. Mostafa Shamsuzzaman, Sabrina Jannat Mitu, Saokat Ahamed

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Marine Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstuarySpecies richnessBenthic zoneSpecies evennessEcologyDiversity indexWater qualityDominance (genetics)GeographyOceanographyEnvironmental scienceBiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal distribution of shellfish assemblages, together with water quality data, was conducted in the Sangu river estuary of Bangladesh to assess shellfish's diversity index during winter, pre-monsoon, and monsoon and post-monsoon periods. A total of 15 species of shellfish belonging to 9 families was recorded of which  Acetes  sp. (25.18%),  Matuta victor  (18.77%),  Exopalaemon styliferus  (18.28%),  Parapenaeopsis sculptilis  (14.22%) were found to be most dominant species during the study period. Significant temporal differences were observed for water temperature, salinity, water transparency, P H  and DO. The diversity indices, Shannon-Wiener diversity index and Margalef richness index showed a significant difference among the seasons while no significant difference was observed in the Pielou’s evenness index and Simpson dominance index. The analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was used to test for significant differences in species assemblages between sampling seasons. At the similarity of 74.8%, three groups were attained while winter and pre-monsoon showed separate clustering from other groups. The Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (nMDS) showed 50% similarity in all seasons based on Bray-Curtis similarity matrix. The CCA ordination indicated that temperature was the most important environmental parameter shaping the shellfish assemblage structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Marine ScienceSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207