MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3098328012 · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76436-0

Publisher Correction: Characterization of three TRAPPC11 variants suggests a critical role for the extreme carboxy terminus of the protein

2020· erratum· en· W3098328012 on OpenAlexaff
Miroslav P. Milev, Daniela Stanga, Anne Schänzer, A. Nascimento, Djenann Saint‐Dic, C. Ortez, Daniel Natera‐de Benito, Desiré González Barrios, J. Colomer, Carmen Badosa, Cristina Jou, P. Gallano, Lidia González‐Quereda, Ana Töpf, Katherine Johnson, Volker Straub, Andreas Hahn, Michael Sacher, C. Jimenez‐Mallebrera

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiotin and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational biologyBiologyComputer scienceBioinformaticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicBiotin and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207