MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3098521170 · doi:10.5194/epsc2020-263

Characterisation of Transneptunian Binaries in the HST Archive.

2020· article· en· W3098521170 on OpenAlexaff
Richard D. Smith, Wesley C. Fraser, A. Fitzsimmons

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrightnessBinary numberPhysicsAstrophysicsPlanetesimalSolar SystemAstronomyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binary Transneptunian Objects (TNOs) have remained virtually unaltered since the formation of the solar system. They can therefore provide valuable insights into the history and properties of objects from the outer solar system, such as object compositions and dynamical history, including the effects of planetary migration on primordial planetesimal populations. Benecchi et al. 2009 measured the colours of 23 TNO binaries using the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), reporting a strong correlation between primary-secondary F606W-F814W colours. Marsset et al. 2020 extended this work into the NIR, adding a further three TNO binary objects with accurate colour measurements made using the Gemini-North telescope which indicated a similar colour correlation in the infrared. We aim to increase the number of binary TNOs with accurate NIR colour measurements by reprocessing data available in the HST archive using a consistent MCMC-based point spread function (PSF)-fitting algorithm. We explore both the position and brightness parameter space for the binary components. Tiny Tim (Krist et al., 2011) PSFs are generated for each component and planted in a model image that is compared with the HST archive image to identify best-fit PSF parameter values. These values are then used to produce and subtract a final model image, providing accurate likelihood estimates for the in-image position and photometric brightness of each component. We will present the results of applying the algorithm to archival data of 24 known binaries, including both optical and NIR colour measurements of both binary components. We will also provide a measure of our sensitivity to binary component separations and brightness ratios. Our results will be compared to the correlated colours observed by Benecchi et al. (2009) and Marsset et al. (2020). References:S. D. Benecchi, K. S. Noll, W. M. Grundy, M. W. Buie, D. C. Stephens, andH. F. Levison. The correlated colors of transneptunian binaries. Icarus, 200(1):292–303, Mar 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2008.10.025.J Krist, R Hook, and F Stoehr. 20 years of hubble space telescope opticalmodeling using tiny tim, 2011. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1117/12.892762.Micha ̈el Marsset, Wesley C. Fraser, Michele T. Bannister, Megan E. Schwamb, Rosemary E. Pike, Susan Benecchi, J. J. Kavelaars, Mike Alexandersen, Ying-Tung Chen, Brett J. Gladman, Stephen D. J. Gwyn, Jean-Marc Petit, and Kathryn Volk. Col-OSSOS: Compositional Homogeneity of Three KuiperBelt Binaries.The Planetary Science Journal, 1(1):16, June 2020. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ab8cc0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstro and Planetary Science→French-language works237,207→