On the Optimal Weighted $\ell_2$ Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the linear model $\mathbf{y} = \mathbf{X} \mathbf{\beta}_\star + \mathbf{\epsilon}$ with $\mathbf{X}\in \mathbb{R}^{n\times p}$ in the overparameterized regime $p>n$. We estimate $\mathbf{\beta}_\star$ via generalized (weighted) ridge regression: $\hat{\mathbf{\beta}}_\lambda = \left(\mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{X} + \lambda \mathbf{\Sigma}_w\right)^\dagger \mathbf{X}^T\mathbf{y}$, where $\mathbf{\Sigma}_w$ is the weighting matrix. Under a random design setting with general data covariance $\mathbf{\Sigma}_x$ and anisotropic prior on the true coefficients $\mathbb{E}\mathbf{\beta}_\star\mathbf{\beta}_\star^T = \mathbf{\Sigma}_\beta$, we provide an exact characterization of the prediction risk $\mathbb{E}(y-\mathbf{x}^T\hat{\mathbf{\beta}}_\lambda)^2$ in the proportional asymptotic limit $p/n\rightarrow \gamma \in (1,\infty)$. Our general setup leads to a number of interesting findings. We outline precise conditions that decide the sign of the optimal setting $\lambda_{\rm opt}$ for the ridge parameter $\lambda$ and confirm the implicit $\ell_2$ regularization effect of overparameterization, which theoretically justifies the surprising empirical observation that $\lambda_{\rm opt}$ can be negative in the overparameterized regime. We also characterize the double descent phenomenon for principal component regression (PCR) when both $\mathbf{X}$ and $\mathbf{\beta}_\star$ are anisotropic. Finally, we determine the optimal weighting matrix $\mathbf{\Sigma}_w$ for both the ridgeless ($\lambda\to 0$) and optimally regularized ($\lambda = \lambda_{\rm opt}$) case, and demonstrate the advantage of the weighted objective over standard ridge regression and PCR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".