MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identifying global trends and drivers of freshwater aluminium concentrations using GloFAD (Global Freshwater Acidification Database)

2020· article· en· W3098716296 on OpenAlexaff
Lobke Rotteveel, Shannon Sterling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissolved organic carbonSurface waterEnvironmental chemistryEcosystemAquatic ecosystemDeposition (geology)Soil acidificationFreshwater ecosystemEnvironmental scienceAluminiumSoil waterChemistrySoil pHEcologyBiologySoil scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aluminum is toxic to most aquatic and terrestrial organisms. Increased Al concentrations in soils and freshwaters are a direct result of human activity, via increases in acid deposition. Elevated Al concentrations pose a wide variety of threats to ecosystems and society, from causing human neurotoxicity, reducing carbon sequestration in forests, threatening biodiversity, and increasing the cost of water treatment. Freshwater aluminium concentrations increased across Europe and North America between the 1960s and 1990s, predominantly due to ecosystem acidification. Following acidic deposition reduction legislation enacted in the 1990s, the problems of acidification and increased freshwater aluminium concentrations were considered solved. However, recently and unexpectedly, Sterling et al. identified aluminum concentrations to be increasing across North America and Scandinavia. Sterling et al. proposed a conceptual model suggesting these widespread increases in freshwater aluminium concentrations resulted from a hysteresis of base cation and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) response to decreasing acidic deposition, where base cation increase is slow compared to that of DOC, resulting in elevated freshwater aluminium concentrations. This process can be exacerbated by further increases in DOC due to increasing global surface temperatures. The Sterling et al. conceptual model is supported by prior work by Weyhenmeyer et al. (2019, Scientific Reports) and Monteith et al., 2007, Nature) who identified widespread decreasing calcium and increasing DOC concentrations. In this study, we aim to validate the Sterling et al. model and identify if it is generalizable to other regions with decreasing calcium and increasing DOC trends, irrespective acidification status. Additionally, we aim to characterize other regions across the globe which are at risk of elevated aluminium concentrations. To fulfill these research goals, we compiled a large-sample water chemistry database from existing national and global datasets – GloFAD (Global Freshwater Acidification Database). The database is comprised of over 11 million unique samples spanning nearly 286,000 sites located between Antarctica and Russia, 18 years (2000 to 2019), and 40 water chemistry parameters. Preliminary analysis shows that aluminium is increasing in 27% to 71% of sites, dependent on the species, base cations are decreasing for 62% to 70% of sites, freshwater organic carbon is increasing for 58% to 64% of sites, and water temperature is increasing in 61% of sites. Increasing dissolved aluminium trends are strongly significantly correlated with decreasing base cation trends (calcium τ = -0.71 and magnesium τ = -0.59, α < 0.05) but not with DOC concentrations (τ = -0.08). The lack of correlation with DOC indicates that drivers of increasing aluminium trends may differ based on the acidification status of the watershed and that regional models of freshwater aluminium chemistry may not be globally applicable. The widespread decreasing base cation trends and strong correlation between decreasing base cation and increasing aluminium trends indicates that increasing aluminium concentrations may become more widespread, posing a threat to aquatic and terrestrial organisms, potentially including humans, reducing carbon sequestration in forests, threatening biodiversity, and increasing water treatment costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207