Recovery of Residues from Olive Industry: Characterization of Simple and Acetylated Lignin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lignin is a renewable material obtained in large quantities as a by-product of the olive industry. In this context, this study aims to examine lignin as macro-monomers in the synthesis of rigid polyurethane foam after chemical modification. Indeed, the lignin extracted from the olive residue is used by chemical treatment according to the organosolv process. Comparison by characterization of the single isolated lignin and the acetylated lignin according to the physicochemical analysisTGA, DSC, FTIR, C-13 NMR, 1-H NMR, and molar mass distribution (sec) shows its value as biomass capable of being transformed into polyol afterchemical modification. acetylation increases the weight and the number of molar masses by 25-50% was also determined. Acetylation has a greater effect on the short chains which are probably richer in free phenolic groups. Mass distribution analyzes reveal a relatively high molar mass in organosolv lignin moreover, polydispersity values are very high (20 >> 1). The characterization of spent olive cake reflects the interest of using this biomass as a source of renewable energy for the production of industrial polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".