MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Constraints on Lightly Ionizing Particles from CDMSlite

2021· article· en· W3098887075 on OpenAlexafffund
I. Alkhatib, D. W. P. Amaral, T. Aralis, T. Aramaki, I. J. Arnquist, I. Ataee Langroudy, E. Azadbakht, S. Banik, D. Barker, C. Bathurst, D. A. Bauer, L. V. S. Bezerra, R. Bhattacharyya, M. A. Bowles, P. L. Brink, R. Bunker, Blas Cabrera, R. Calkins, R. A. Cameron, C. Cartaro, D. G. Cerdeño, Y.-Y. Chang, M. Chaudhuri, R. Chen, N. Chott, J. Cooley, H. Coombes, Jacqueline Corbett, P. Cushman, F. De Brienne, M. L. di Vacri, M. D. Diamond, E. Fascione, E. Figueroa‐Feliciano, C. W. Fink, K. Fouts, M. Fritts, G. Gerbier, R. Germond, M. Ghaith, S. R. Golwala, H. R. Harris, B. A. Hines, M. Hollister, Z. Hong, E. W. Hoppe, L. Hsu, M. E. Huber, V. Iyer, D. Jardin, A. Jastram, Vipul Kashyap, M. H. Kelsey, A. Kubik, Noah Kurinsky, Richard Lawrence, A. Li, B. Loer, E. Lopez Asamar, P. Lukens, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Mahapatra, V. Mandic, N. Mast, A. Mayer, H. Meyer Zu Theenhausen, Eva Michaud, E. Michielin, N. Mirabolfathi, B. Mohanty, J. D. Morales Mendoza, S.S. Nagorny, J. K. Nelson, H. Neog, V. Novati, J. L. Orrell, S. M. Oser, W. A. Page, R. Partridge, R. Podviianiuk, F. Ponce, S. S. Poudel, A. Pradeep, M. Pyle, W. Rau, E. Reid, R. Ren, T. Reynolds, A. Roberts, A. E. Robinson, T. Saab, B. Sadoulet, J. Sander, Amirmohammad Sattari, R. W. Schnee, S. Scorza, B. Serfass, D. J. Sincavage, C. Stanford, John Street, D. Toback, R. Underwood, S. Verma, A. N. Villano, B. von Krosigk, S. L. Watkins, J. S. Wilson, M. J. Wilson, J. Winchell, D. H. Wright, S. Yellin, B. A. Young, T. C. Yu, E. Zhang, H. G. Zhang, X. Zhao, Liang Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsLaurentian UniversityUniversité de MontréalQueen's UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMFUniversity of Toronto
FundersPacific Northwest National LaboratoryOffice of International Science and EngineeringCanada First Research Excellence FundDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of IndiaStanford UniversitySLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryFermilabMinnesota Department of Natural ResourcesBattelleU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsCharge (physics)RecoilAtomic physicsSensitivity (control systems)Intensity (physics)IonizationParticle physicsOpticsQuantum mechanicsIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cryogenic Dark Matter Search low ionization threshold experiment (CDMSlite) achieved efficient detection of very small recoil energies in its germanium target, resulting in sensitivity to lightly ionizing particles (LIPs) in a previously unexplored region of charge, mass, and velocity parameter space. We report first direct-detection limits calculated using the optimum interval method on the vertical intensity of cosmogenically produced LIPs with an electric charge smaller than $e/(3\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{5}$), as well as the strongest limits for charge $\ensuremath{\le}e/160$, with a minimum vertical intensity of $1.36\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}7}\text{ }\text{ }{\mathrm{cm}}^{\ensuremath{-}2}\text{ }{\mathrm{s}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\text{ }{\mathrm{sr}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ at charge $e/160$. These results apply over a wide range of LIP masses ($5\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{MeV}/{c}^{2}$ to $100\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{TeV}/{c}^{2}$) and cover a wide range of $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ values ($0.1--{10}^{6}$), thus excluding nonrelativistic LIPs with $\ensuremath{\beta}\ensuremath{\gamma}$ as small as 0.1 for the first time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207