MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

824 Modulation of TLR3 protein in response to radiation in squamous cell lung carcinoma

2020· article· en· W3098985585 on OpenAlexaff
Jeru Manoj Manuel, Ebru Taş, Cleopatra Rutihinda, Ayman Oweida

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTLR3Cancer researchLung cancerDownregulation and upregulationRadiation therapyMedicineImmunotherapyCancerInnate immune systemToll-like receptorAbscopal effectCellImmune systemImmunologyBiologyOncologyInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Squamous cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the second most common type of lung cancer. Treatment is complicated due to the lack of mutated molecular targets.1 Radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used to treat SCLC, but relapse and tumor progression are common. The combination of immunotherapy (IT) with RT can enhance the effect observed with RT alone.2 Effective combination of IT and RT requires an understanding of the pathways that synergize to enhance tumor cell kill in SCLC. Our lab has identified Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) as a molecule that is regulated by RT and can be targeted with IT. Toll-like receptors serve a crucial role against tumor cells by activating innate and adaptive immune responses that boost antitumor immunity.3 4 TLR3 is the only receptor whose molecular mechanism functions independent of MyD88, leading to NF-κB mediated apoptosis.5 We hypothesized that increased TLR3 expression would be associated with improved response to RT. We further hypothesized that RT can downregulate TLR3 and that this effect can be reversed with TLR3 agonists leading to enhanced tumor antigen recognition. We aim to use this data to formulate further studies using combined RT and IT. Methods Mouse (KLN205) and human (SW900) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines were used to study the effect of radiation on TLR3 expression. Irradiation was performed using the gammacell 3000 elan irradiator. Cells were irradiated with 0, 5, 10 and 20 Gy. Protein extraction was performed 48 and 72 hours after RT. Protein extracts were analyzed by Western Blot. Further, TLR3 mRNA expression and 5-year overall survival of SCLC patients was obtained from public databases. Kaplan-Meier method was used to correlate between TLR3 mRNA expression and survival. Results In vitro studies and western blot analysis demonstrated a decrease of TLR3 expression in response to increasing doses of radiation. This observation was consistent in mouse and human SCC cell lines. In silico analysis of SCLC patients who received RT showed that increased TLR3 mRNA expression was associated with improved overall survival and disease-free survival. Conclusions Our findings point to an important role for TLR3 in SCLC. Combining RT with TLR3 agonists may enhance the tumor response to RT. Several complementary experiments are underway in our lab to use the TLR3 agonist, Poly I:C, which will allow a better understanding of the effect of RT on TLR3. References George J, Lim SJ, Jang SJ, et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature 2015;524:47–53. Darragh L, Oweida A, Karam SD. Overcoming resistance to combination radiation-immunotherapy: a focus on contributing pathways withing the tumor microenvironment. Frontiers in Immunology 2019;9:3154. Shcheblyakov D, Logunov DY, Tukhvatulin AI, et al. Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs): The Role in Tumor Progression. Acta Naturae 2010;2(3):21-9. Kawai T, Akira S. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol 2010;11:373–384. Bianchi F, Alexiadis S, Camiasaschi C, et al. TLR3 expression induces apoptosis in Human Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2020 Feb;21(4):1440.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207