Abstract 13700: Role of Parp1-pkm2 Axis in the Pathogenesis of Right Ventricular Failure Associated With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a poor prognostic factor for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients. Inflammation, oxidative stress-induced DNA damage, and glycolysis are key RVF-driven pathways triggering cardiomyocytes (CM) dysfunction. Persistent DNA damage-dependent Poly (ADP ribose) Polymerase 1 (PARP1) activation was documented to promote glycolysis and pro-inflammatory responses through nuclear retention of Pyruvate Kinase Muscle isozyme 2 (PKM2). Despite the tremendous attention to PARP1/PKM2 axis in many pathologies, their implication in RVF remains unexplored. We hypothesized sustained PARP1 activation accounts for nuclear PKM2 localization, contributing to CM dysfunction and transition from compensated (cRVH) to decompensated RVH(dRVH). Methods and Results: We found by WB and IF that PARP1/PKM2 expression/activity is increased in dRVH (patients died from RVF, n=9) compared to cRVH (Cardiac index >2.2, n=14) and control donors (n=14) and correlates with RV hypertrophy and fibrosis. Similar findings were found in two rat models of RVF (monocrotaline; MCT, pulmonary artery banding; PAB). In addition, cardiac inflammation (NF-kB, HMGB1, IL-8, CCL-2, SOCS3, CD68), oxidative DNA damage (MTH1, 8-oxodG), and apoptosis (TUNEL) were significantly increased in dRVH compared to cRVH (human and rat models). In vitro , we confirmed by WB and IF that oxidative DNA damage (H 2 O 2 ) induce nuclear expression of PARP1/PKM2 in CM leading to the release of inflammatory mediators (NFkB, HMGB1) and cell death. These effects were prevented by pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 (ABT888) and enforced cytosolic retention of PKM2 (TEPP46 and DASA58). In vivo , PARP1 inhibition (Olaparib; 10mg/kg) as well as TEPP46 (25mg/kg) delayed progression of RVF (CO, hypertrophy, fibrosis, inflammation, DNA damage, apoptosis) in PAB rats (n=8 per groups). Preliminary data indicate CM-specific inactivation of PARP1 induces resistance to RVF in PAB mice (All p<0.05). Conclusions: We demonstrated for the first time that PARP1/PKM2 axis is a critical integrator of oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolic dysfunction during pathological RVF. Modulating PARP1/PKM2 axis may represent a promising avenue for ameliorating RVF in PAH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".