MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PMSM Torque Ripple Minimization Using an Adaptive Iterative Learning Control

2020· article· en· W3099089875 on OpenAlexaff
Shirin Fartash Toloue, Mehrdad Moallem

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Iterative learning controlTorqueTorque rippleTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceController (irrigation)MinificationDirect torque controlControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Induction motorPhysicsVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parasitic torque pulsations existing in permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) degrade their performance, particularly at low speeds. In this paper, an adaptive iterative learning control (ILC) strategy is proposed for torque ripple minimization in a PMSM drive system. An analysis is conducted to study the impact of ILC gains on the steady-state and transient performance of the system. Accordingly, a real-time tuning method based on multi-variable sliding-mode extremum seeking (MSES) is proposed to adjust the ILC gains. The proposed controller is applied to a PMSM and its performance is verified by comparing the results with a similar controller using a non-adaptive ILC scheme. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed ILC scheme in achieving lower torque ripples and faster transient performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207