MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PMSM Torque Ripple Minimization Using an Adaptive Iterative Learning Control

2020· article· en· W3099089875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIECON 2020 The 46th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Iterative learning controlTorqueTorque rippleTransient (computer programming)Computer scienceController (irrigation)MinificationDirect torque controlControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Induction motorPhysicsVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parasitic torque pulsations existing in permanent magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) degrade their performance, particularly at low speeds. In this paper, an adaptive iterative learning control (ILC) strategy is proposed for torque ripple minimization in a PMSM drive system. An analysis is conducted to study the impact of ILC gains on the steady-state and transient performance of the system. Accordingly, a real-time tuning method based on multi-variable sliding-mode extremum seeking (MSES) is proposed to adjust the ILC gains. The proposed controller is applied to a PMSM and its performance is verified by comparing the results with a similar controller using a non-adaptive ILC scheme. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed ILC scheme in achieving lower torque ripples and faster transient performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it