Evaluation of pH-dependent amphiphilic carbosilane dendrons in micelle formation, drug loading and HIV-1 infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New amphiphilic carbosilane dendrons with pH-dependent behaviour based on the presence of carboxylate (propionate or succinate) groups at their peripheries and a fatty acid at the focal point were developed. In the presence of salts, they were able to form micelles with critical aggregation concentrations increasing with increasing dendron generation. Their thermodynamic parameters were calculated from surface tension measurements and their diameters at different pHs were measured by dynamic light scattering. These micelles were stable at basic pH but degraded under acidic conditions. No significant differences were found for the propionate and succinate based dendron micelles at basic or acidic pH, but the succinate dendron assemblies were more stable at neutral pH. The properties of these systems as drug nano-carriers were studied using both hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules, and the drug loading varied with the structure and charge of the drug. In addition, due to the presence of multiple negative charges, the dendrons exhibited anti-HIV activity. Higher generation dendrons with more peripheral carboxylates that were not assembled into micelles were more active than micelles composed of lower generation dendrons having fewer peripheral carboxylates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".