MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099216351 · doi:10.32696/ajpkm.v4i2.516

Edukasi Hipertensi dan Pelatihan Pembuatan Teh Herbal Kombinasi Daun Pegagan (Centella asiatica) Dan Rimpang Kunyit (Curcuma longa) Sebagai Minuman Kesehatan Antihipertensi

2020· article· id· W3099216351 on OpenAlexaff
Patonah Hasimun, Dadang Juanda, Ika Kurnia Sukmawati, Ari Yuniarto

Bibliographic record

VenueAmaliah Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
FundersDirectorate for Biological Sciences
KeywordsTraditional medicineMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kecenderungan jumlah penderita hipertensi yang terus meningkat setiap tahunnya, memerlukan upaya pengendalian untuk mencegah resiko komplikasi kardiovaskular. Secara empiris daun pegagan dan rimpang kunyit telah dimanfaatkan oleh masyarakat untuk mengatasi berbagai macam penyakit termasuk hipertensi. Pemerintah melalui kemenkes telah menetapkan fokus riset dan pemanfaatan bahan alam untuk mengelola hipertensi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan edukasi pengelolaan hipertensi serta pelatihan pembuatan teh herbal yang mengandung daun pegagan dan rimpang kunyit sebagai minuman kesehatan antihipertensi. Kegiatan dilaksanakan di keluraha Padasuka RW05 yang bekerja sama dengan ketua RW dan ketua PKK kelurahan Padasuka. Edukasi dilakukan melalui metode ceramah dan diskusi. Selanjutnya masyarakat mendapat pelatihan cara membuat teh herbal hasil riset kampus yang mengandung daun pegagan dan rimpang kunyit serta pemanis stevia. Kegiatan diakhiri dengan minum teh herbal bersama. Kegiatan ini bermanfaat meningkatkan nilai guna tanaman herbal daun pegagan dan rimpang kunyit yang sudah dikenal oleh masyarakat, meningkatkan pengetahuan untuk mengendalikan hipertensi serta meningkatkan keterampilan masyarakat dalam membuat teh herbal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmaliah Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada MasyarakatSame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207