MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099241881 · doi:10.11159/iccste20.228

Development of a Life Cycle Inventory Dataset for Recycled ConcreteAggregates in the City of Abu Dhabi

2020· article· en· W3099241881 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammed H. Alzard, Hilal El-Hassan, Tamer El‐Maaddawy

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUnited Arab Emirates University
KeywordsAbu dhabiLife cycle inventoryCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceLife-cycle assessmentEngineeringGeographyArchaeologyEconomicsProduction (economics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental life cycle inventory (LCI) datasets are critical to conduct life cycle assessment (LCA) of concrete products.Obtaining these values from local practice is necessary to provide accurate assessment results that reflect real-life scenarios.The datasets for the recycling process of construction and demolition waste into recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) in the city of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates are currently unavailable.Accordingly, this research aims to determine a detailed environmental LCI dataset for the production of RCA in Abu Dhabi.An extensive investigation of the RCA production practice was performed to highlight the input and output of each process unit.The methodology proposed by the International Standards Organization (ISO) to build an LCI (ISO 14040) was adopted.The resulting environmental LCI value for RCA production was determined to be 6.67x10 -4 kg CO2eq per kilogram of produced RCA.Research findings serve as a benchmark to evaluate the environmental sustainability of RCA and RCA-based products in a holistic LCA study, while also enriching the LCI of the city of Abu Dhabi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicRecycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceFrench-language works237,207