MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099326357 · doi:10.1515/ang-2020-0057

Elly McCausland. 2019. <i>Malory’s Magic Book: King Arthur and the Child, 1862–1980</i>. Arthurian Studies 86. Cambridge: Brewer, xi + 234 pp., 12 illustr., £ 60.00/$ 99.00.

2020· article· en· W3099326357 on OpenAlexaff
Cory James Rushton

Bibliographic record

VenueAnglia - Zeitschrift für englische Philologie · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMAGIC (telescope)ArtHistoryLiteraturePhilosophyClassicsPhysicsAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article Elly McCausland. 2019. Malory’s Magic Book: King Arthur and the Child, 1862–1980. Arthurian Studies 86. Cambridge: Brewer, xi + 234 pp., 12 illustr., £ 60.00/$ 99.00. was published on November 1, 2020 in the journal Anglia (volume 138, issue 4).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.190
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1900.100

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueAnglia - Zeitschrift für englische PhilologieSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207