Abstract 13829: Index Event, Clinical Outcomes and Response to Vericiguat in the Victoria Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects with HF with Reduced EF) trial included 5050 patients in 3 discrete subgroups reflecting their index worsening heart failure (HF) event: <3 months after HF hospitalization (HFH) (n=3366), 3-6 months after HFH (n=871), and those requiring IV diuretic therapy without HFH within the prior 3 months (n=813). We evaluated clinical characteristics, outcomes and treatment response to vericiguat across these index event subgroups in VICTORIA. Methods: We compared primary composite (CV death and HFH) and secondary (all-cause death and HFH) outcomes across index event subgroups, both before and after adjusting for clinical covariates (HF duration, NYHA class, medical history, heart rate, HF medications and laboratory values including baseline NT-proBNP), as well as their response to vericiguat. Results: Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms within each subgroup. Over a median follow up of 10.8 months, the absolute primary event rates were high in all subgroups (20.5 - 42.5 per 100 patient-years, Figure). Compared to the IV diuretic group highest relative risk was in HFH <3 months (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.46-1.95), followed by HFH 3-6 months (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.06-1.50). After multivariable adjustment, this difference remained significant only in HFH <3 months (adjusted HR [vs IV diuretic] 1.47, 95% CI 1.26-1.72). Vericiguat was associated with reduced risk of the primary outcome overall (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98) and in all 3 subgroups, with no evidence of treatment heterogeneity. Similar results were evident for the secondary composite outcome. Conclusions: Among patients with worsening chronic HF, those within a 3 month window of HFH had almost a 1.5 times risk of CV death or HFH compared to those requiring IV diuretics but not HFH , irrespective of age or clinical risk factors. Vericiguat added to standard therapy was associated with similar benefit across the spectrum of risk in worsening HF.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".