MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Evaluating and modelling the impacts of climate change and reference datasets on river water temperatures for a hydropower system with two outlets

2020· article· en· W3099538731 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philippe Gatien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributaryHydropowerEnvironmental scienceContext (archaeology)HydroelectricityHydrology (agriculture)Downstream (manufacturing)StreamflowClimate changeDrainage basinEcologyGeographyGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water temperature modelling has become an essential tool in the management of ectotherm species downstream of dams in North American rivers. The main objective of this project is to compare different datasets and their ability to adequately simulate water temperatures in the Nechako River, (B.C., Canada) downstream of a major dam where the flow is not managed for hydroelectric production, but spills are programmed to cool the downstream reaches. This will ultimately lead to a reassessment of water management in the context of climate change to ensure the survival of fish migrating or living in the reaches located downstream of the dam during warm periods. Water in the Nechako River stems from the Nechako reservoir at the Skins lake spillway and flows into river through a series of lakes prior to reaching Finmoore, where federal regulations stipulate that water temperatures must be maintained below 20 °C. The river has multiple tributaries on it’s 250 km journey including the Nautley river. The river flow is simulated using a 1D unsteady flow simulation and lateral inflows using HEC-RAS. Water temperature simulations are then conducted using different datasets. The first is a series of observed meteorological data spanning from 2017 to present day from two different weather stations near the river. The second dataset is ERA5, a reanalysis product that’s gridded every 0.25°. Eleven stations nearest to the river were extracted over the same period as the observations. Both datasets were used to calibrate five parameters (dust coefficient, three wind function parameters and the Richardson number) three times using the mean absolute error (MAE), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NS) and root mean squared error (RMSE) by comparing the observed and simulated temperatures near Finmoore. Individual calibrations were performed over each available summer from early June to late August and then validated over the rest of the data to ensure the robustness of the results. Overall, the reanalysis dataset outperformed the available observations for thermal representation of the river. To further understand the thermal model, a sensitivity analysis was performed on the different inputs (inflow water temperature, air temperature, wind speed, etc.). The model showed very little sensitivity to the characteristics of the inflow (temperature, volume) as the point of interest was so far downstream. In fact, environmental factors such as air temperature had a greater impact on water temperature than upstream conditions at the reservoir spillway. This effect seems to be mostly attributable to Cheslatta Lake with its long water residence time that can reach upwards of three days. The potential effects of climate change on water temperature were then investigated by modifying existing weather data like air temperature with the delta method on a monthly basis using the RCP8.5 emission scenario. Water temperatures increased throughout by roughly 2.5°C downstream, near Finmoore.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→