MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099645355 · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100054

A chimera approach for MP-PIC simulations of dense particulate flows using large parcel size relative to the computational cell size

2020· article· en· W3099645355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Journal Advances · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMitacs
KeywordsCell sizeChimera (genetics)ParticulatesEnvironmental sciencePhysicsStatistical physicsMechanicsChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Multiphase Particle in Cell (MP-PIC) is an Eulerian-Lagrangian numerical method that resolves the particle-particle interactions using the averages mapped from the Lagrangian parcels onto the Eulerian mesh. The MPPIC's accuracy depends on mesh quality and resolution, but the mesh resolution requirements for the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) fields and MP-PIC models are not in accordance. This paper proposes a chimera approach, which implements two overlapping meshes in the Lagrangian-Eulerian framework with disparate length scales - a fine mesh for the CFD fields and a coarser mesh for the MP-PIC fields. The CFD fields are mapped to the MP-PIC mesh, while the coarse mesh fields, such as solids volume fraction and momentum source of parcels, are mapped to the finer CFD mesh. The National Energy Technology Laboratory's (NETL) Small-Scale Challenge Problems-I (SSCP-I) fluidized bed case is selected for simulations and model validation. A parametric study is conducted, which considers different drag and inter-particle stress models and different solids volume fraction limits. We show that the chimera approach results in a realistic turbulent flow field for accurate drag force calculations on parcels while preserving adequate conditions for the submodels’ validity under MP-PIC. The results are in good agreement with the experimental findings, specifically the pressure drop, Eulerian average particle velocity, and granular temperature. The chimera method is developed to overcome the averaging limitations when the particle size is comparable to the cell size or when particle collisions may not be captured accurately, and a finer mesh is required for the fluid flow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it