MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099689983 · doi:10.1080/00071668.2020.1849557

Assessing the effect of water deprivation on the efficacy of on-farm euthanasia methods for broiler chickens

2020· article· en· W3099689983 on OpenAlexafffund
Bethany Baker-Cook, Stephanie Torrey, Patricia V. Turner, T.D. Knezacek, Jenny Nicholds, Susantha Gomis, K. Schwean-Lardner

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Poultry Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersChicken Farmers of SaskatchewanEgg Farmers of CanadaPoultry Industry CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Poultry Research Council
KeywordsUnconsciousnessBroilerDehydrationAnimal scienceVeterinary medicineMedicineAnesthesiaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Moribund or diseased poultry requiring euthanasia are often dehydrated. To understand how dehydration influences the efficacy of various killing methods, this experiment investigated the effect of water deprivation (WD) on times to unconsciousness and death.2. Broiler chickens (n = 179) were water-deprived for 0, 24, 48 or 72 hours to mimic dehydration, then killed via manual cervical dislocation, mechanical cervical dislocation (Koechner Euthanising Device (KED)), or non-penetrating captive bolt (Zephyr-EXL), at 8, 22, 36 or 50 d of age. Degree of WD was confirmed by skin turgor, packed cell volume and body weight loss. Method efficacy was evaluated by the time to unconsciousness and death using pupillary light (PUP), palpebral blink (PAL) and nictitating membrane (NIC) reflexes, feather erection (FE), cloacal winking (CW) and convulsions (CN). The extent of damage caused by each method was examined via radiography, gross pathology and histopathology. The main effects of WD time and euthanasia method were analysed by two-way analyses of variance (CRD, PROC MIXED, SAS 9.4) with a-priori contrasts to compare water-deprived versus non-water-deprived (NON) birds.3. Skin turgor, packed cell volume and body weight loss had a quadratic relationship with WD, with highest values for those birds which were water-deprived for 72 h. WD level did not affect time to unconsciousness. Time to death was longer for WD birds than NON, with longer latencies to FE, CW and CN for water-deprived birds. WD only affected radiography or gross pathology scores on d 8, with the extent of subcutaneous haemorrhage within the neck decreasing as WD increased.4. The shortest latency to PUP loss, at all ages, and to PAL and NIC loss, at 22 d, was with the Zephyr-EXL. KED had the longest time to unconsciousness (PUP, PAL and NIC), at all ages, and to death, at 36 and 50 d.5. Overall, WD increased time to death, but did not affect the onset of unconsciousness, with no interaction between methods and WD level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Poultry ScienceSame topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207