MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099711861 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628682

Outflows, infall and evolution of a sample of embedded low-mass protostars

2017· article· en· W3099711861 on OpenAlexaff
J. C. Mottram, E. F. van Dishoeck, L. E. Kristensen, A. Karska, I. San José-García, S. Khanna, G. J. Herczeg, Ph. André, S. Bontemps, S. Cabrit, M. T. Carney, M. N. Drozdovskaya, M. M. Dunham, Neal J. Evans, D. Fedele, J. D. Green, D. Harsono, Doug Johnstone, J. K. Jørgensen, V. Könyves, B. Nisini, M. V. Persson, M. Tafalla, R. Visser, U. A. Yíldíz

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieStockholms UniversitetKU LeuvenMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekChalmers Tekniska HögskolaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesBundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und TechnologieKoninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van WetenschappenFundacja na rzecz Nauki PolskiejEuropean CommissionCalifornia Institute of Technology
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsProtostarOutflowAccretion (finance)Low MassIsotopologueStar formationAstronomySpectral lineGalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context. Herschel observations of water and highly excited CO (J > 9) have allowed the physical and chemical conditions in the more active parts of protostellar outflows to be quantified in detail for the first time. However, to date, the studied samples of Class 0/I protostars in nearby star-forming regions have been selected from bright, well-known sources and have not been large enough for statistically significant trends to be firmly established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations82
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207