MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099772013

4 A CLASSIFYING SPACE FOR COMMUTATIVITY IN LIE GROUPS

2016· article· en· W3099772013 on OpenAlexaff
Alejandro Ádem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsClassifying spaceCommutative propertyCohomologyHomotopyPure mathematicsHomotopy groupSpace (punctuation)Group (periodic table)Lie groupBott periodicity theoremEilenberg–MacLane spaceLie algebraAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article we consider a space B com G assembled from commuting elements in a Lie group G first defined by Adem, Cohen and Torres-Giese.We describe homotopy-theoretic properties of these spaces using homotopy colimits, and their role as a classifying space for transitionally commutative bundles.We prove that Z B com U is a loop space and define a notion of commutative K-theory for bundles over a finite complex X , which is isomorphic to OEX; Z B com U .We compute the rational cohomology of B com G for G equal to any of the classical groups SU.r/, U.q/ and Sp.k/, and exhibit the rational cohomologies of B com U , B com SU and B com

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHomotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic TopologyFrench-language works237,207