MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099827730 · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01065

Assessing hERG1 Blockade from Bayesian Machine-Learning-Optimized Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation Simulations

2020· article· en· W3099827730 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahdi Mousaei, Meruyert Kudaibergenova, Alexander D. MacKerell, Sergei Y. Noskov

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsDruggabilityChemical spaceDocking (animal)hERGChemistryIn silicoComputational biologyCardiotoxicityDrug discoveryComputer sciencePotassium channelBiologyBiophysicsMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

-Related (hERG1) potassium channel. There is a compulsory preclinical stage safety assessment for the hERG1 blockade for all classes of drugs, which adds substantially to the cost of drug development. The availability of a high-resolution cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure for the channel in its open/depolarized state solved in 2017 enabled the application of molecular modeling for rapid assessment of drug blockade by molecular docking and simulation techniques. More importantly, if successful, in silico methods may allow a path to lead-compound salvaging by mapping out key block determinants. Here, we report the blind application of the site identification by the ligand competitive saturation (SILCS) protocol to map out druggable/regulatory hotspots in the hERG1 channel available for blockers and activators. The SILCS simulations use small solutes representative of common functional groups to sample the chemical space for the entire protein and its environment using all-atom simulations. The resulting chemical maps, FragMaps, explicitly account for receptor flexibility, protein-fragment interactions, and fragment desolvation penalty allowing for rapid ranking of potential ligands as blockers or nonblockers of hERG1. To illustrate the power of the approach, SILCS was applied to a test set of 55 blockers with diverse chemical scaffolds and pIC50 values measured under uniform conditions. The original SILCS model was based on the all-atom modeling of the hERG1 channel in an explicit lipid bilayer and was further augmented with a Bayesian-optimization/machine-learning (BML) stage employing an independent literature-derived training set of 163 molecules. BML approach was used to determine weighting factors for the FragMaps contributions to the scoring function. pIC50 predictions from the combined SILCS/BML approach to the 55 blockers showed a Pearson correlation (PC) coefficient of >0.535 relative to the experimental data. SILCS/BML model was shown to yield substantially improved performance as compared to commonly used rigid and flexible molecular docking methods for a well-established cohort of hERG1 blockers, where no correlation with experimental data was recorded. SILCS/BML results also suggest that a proper weighting of protonation states of common blockers present at physiological pH is essential for accurate predictions of blocker potency. The precalculated and optimized SILCS FragMaps can now be used for the rapid screening of small molecules for their cardiotoxic potential as well as for exploring alternative binding pockets in the hERG1 channel with applications to the rational design of activators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.005
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Information and ModelingSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207