MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099891393 · doi:10.11159/iccste20.193

Mechanical Properties and Behavior of Early-Age Fiber-ReinforcedCemented Paste Backfill

2020· article· en· W3099891393 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Iarley Loan Sampaio Libos, Liang Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceFiberComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cemented paste backfill (CPB, a mixture of tailings, cement, and water) has been extensively adopted in underground mines around the world. As a major underground support measure, CPB is required to provide sufficient ground support to the underground mined-out space (called stopes). To improve the mechanical behavior of CPB, fiber reinforcement technique has been considered as a promising approach. However, as the key design parameters, mechanical properties, and behavior of fiber-reinforced CPB (FR-CPB) have not been systematically investigated. This study aims to experimentally investigate the tension and compression behavior of FR-CPB and associated mechanical properties including elastic modulus, tensile strength, and unconfined compressive strength at early-age curing time (1, 3, and 7 days). Moreover, an experimental program was designed and performed to measure the electric conductivity and matric suction in FR-CPB. The monitored results were used to explain the evolution of the mechanical properties and behavior of FR-CPB. The obtained results show that a significant improvement of mechanical properties and behavior of CPB has been achieved due to the fiber inclusion in the CPB matrix. Moreover, the FR-CPB shows an enhanced energy absorption to resist material failure. Additionally, the substantial improvement of mechanical properties and behavior (hardening and softening stages) at early-age curing time indicates the key role played by the cement hydration in the CPB matrix. The obtained results from the present study can improve the understanding of the mechanical behavior of FR-CPB and thus contribute to the successful implementation of the fiber reinforcement technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.360
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the International Conference on Civil, Structural and Transportation EngineeringSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207