MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099894275 · doi:10.1109/ius46767.2020.9251725

Real-time Power Doppler on an Ultrafast High-Frequency Hardware Beamformer

2020· article· en· W3099894275 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Campbell, Christopher Samson, Jeremy A. Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame rateField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceInfinite impulse responseDoppler effectFilter (signal processing)Computer hardwareElectronic engineeringAcousticsComputer visionPhysicsEngineeringDigital filter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a custom-developed high-frequency ultrafast power Doppler imaging system with real-time hardware-based processing and display. Previous work was presented on the development of an ultra-fast high-frequency hardware-based beamformer capable of performing diverging wave imaging with up to 0.72 kHz frame rates. In this study, modifications to the ultra-fast beamformer enabled power Doppler imaging at a real-time display frame rate of 20 Hz. Using a 40 MHz 64 element phased array endoscope, the system transmitted 16 diverging waves/frame for at a frame rate of 0.72kHz. The high acquisition rate enables the capture of 38 B-Mode frames at a 20 Hz display rate. A 6-tap elliptic infinite impulse response (IIR) filter with a cut-off at 75 Hz was implemented on a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) to suppress tissue motion. The IIR filter required 20 frames to initialize the filter and used the remaining 16 frames to generate a power Doppler image.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207