MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3099924134 · doi:10.29173/cais1175

Digital Archiving by Nigerian and Foreign Authors in a Low Resource Context: A Content Analysis of Publications on Natural Language Processing of Nigerian Languages

2020· article· en· W3099924134 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Toluwase Asubiaro

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWikis in Education and Collaboration
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusDigital libraryWeb of scienceLibrary scienceContext (archaeology)Foreign languageHumanitiesComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical scienceGeographyArtPhilosophyLinguisticsMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated if there is a difference in the number of articles, datasets and computer codes that foreign and Nigerian authors of scientific publications on natural language processing (NLP) of Nigerian languages deposited in digital archives. Relevant articles were systematically retrieved from Google, Web of Science and Scopus. Authorship type and data archiving information was extracted from the full text of the relevant publications. Result shows that papers with foreign authorship (80.4%) published their articles in non-commercial repositories, more than papers with Nigerian authorship (55.3%). Similarly, few papers with foreign authorship deposited research data (19.1%) and computer codes (10.4%), while none of the papers with Nigerian authorship did. It was recommended that librarians in Nigeria should create awareness on the benefits of digital archiving and open science. Cette étude a eximané les différences dans le nombre d'articles, d'ensembles de données et de codes informatiques dans les articles scientifiques sur le traitement du langage naturel que les auteurs nigériens et les auteurs étrangers ont soumis dans les dépôts d'autoarchivage. Les articles pertinents ont été systématiquement extraits de Google, Web of Science et Scopus. Les informations relatives au type d'auteur et à l'archivage des données ont été extraites du texte intégral des publications pertinentes. Les résultats montrent que les articles écrits par des auteurs étrangers ont davantage publié leurs articles dans des dépôts non commerciaux (80,4%) que les auteurs nigériens (55,3%). Peu d'auteurs étrangers ont déposé des données de recherche (19,1%) et des codes informatiques (10,4%) tandis qu'aucun auteur nigérien ne l'a fait. Ces résultats démontrent l'importance de la sensibilisation aux avantages des dépôt d'archivage et de la science ouverte pour les bibliothécaires nigériens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0210.030
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSISame topicWikis in Education and CollaborationFrench-language works237,207