MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100169720 · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abc0eb

Erratum: “MIRIS Paα Galactic Plane Survey. I. Comparison with IPHAS Hα in ℓ = 96°–116°” (2018, ApJS, 238, 28)

2020· erratum· en· W3100169720 on OpenAlexaff
Il-Joong Kim, Jeonghyun Pyo, Woong-Seob Jeong, Kwang‐Il Seon, Takao Nakagawa, Min Kim, Won-Kee Park, Dae‐Hee Lee, Dukhang Lee, Bongkon Moon, Sung‐Joon Park, Young‐Sik Park, Toshio Matsumoto, Wonyong Han

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2020
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstrophysicsAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In published article, we did not take into account that the [N II] λλ6548, 6584 Å lines are within the wavelength range of the IPHAS Hα filter.The [N II] to Hα line ratio observed for the H II regions in our Galaxy is not negligible ([N II]/Hα≈0.25;Haffner et al. 2009).Therefore, in this erratum, we correct the Hα fluxes of the H II regions (or candidates) estimated in the published article

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0630.072

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207