A Physiological Approach to Pharmacokinetics in Chronic Kidney Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The conventional approach to approximating the pharmacokinetics of drugs in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) only accounts for changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate. However, CKD is a systemic and multifaceted disease that alters many body systems. Therefore, the objective of this exercise was to develop and evaluate a whole-body mechanistic approach to predicting pharmacokinetics in patients with CKD. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were developed in PK-Sim v8.0 (www.open-systems-pharmacology.org) to mechanistically represent the disposition of 7 compounds in healthy human adults. The 7 compounds selected were eliminated by glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion by the organic cation transport system to varying degrees. After a literature search, the healthy adult models were adapted to patients with CKD by numerically accounting for changes in glomerular filtration rate, kidney volume, renal perfusion, hematocrit, plasma protein concentrations, and gastrointestinal transit. Literature-informed interindividual variability was applied to the physiological parameters to facilitate a population approach. Model performance in CKD was evaluated against pharmacokinetic data from 8 clinical trials in the literature. Overall, integration of the CKD parameterization enabled exposure predictions that were within 1.5-fold error across all compounds and patients with varying stages of renal impairment. Notable improvement was observed over the conventional approach to scaling exposure, which failed in all but 1 scenario in patients with advanced CKD. Further research is required to qualify its use for first-in-CKD dose selection and clinical trial planning for a wider selection of renally eliminated compounds, including those subject to anion transport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".