Strategi Pemasaran PT. Sari Melati Kencana Outlet ITC BSD menggunakan Analisa SWOT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Seiring dengan persaingan yang semakin ketat, maka setiap perusahaan harus mampu mempertahankan atau bahkan memperluas pangsa pasarnya. Oleh sebab itu diperlukan strategi pemasaran yang tepat agar tujuan perusahaan tersebut dapat tercapai. Hal ini lah yang menjadi tujuan dari penelitian ini dengan objek penelitian PT Sari Melati Kencana Outlet ITC BSD. Penelitian ini menggunakan Analisa SWOT dimana penggunaan analisis SWOT yang efektif dapat menentukan strategi yang tepat dalam rangka menjaga kelangsungan hidup perusahaan. Pada penelitian ini diketahui hasil SPACE Matrix berada pada kuadran 1 yang berarti perusahaan perlu melakukan strategi yang agresif dengan total skor faktor internal 1,32 dan skor faktor eksternal 0,8 yang merujuk pada strategi disversifikasi konsentrik. Dengan menggunakan strategi SO (Strength Opportunities), Pizza Hut ITC BSD berusaha memaksimalkan kekuatan yang dimiliki untuk memanfaatkan peluang yang ada sehingga diharapkan mampu meraih pelanggan sebanyak-banyaknya dan mencapai sales yang tinggi. Kata Kunci : SWOT analisis, Space Matrix, Strategi Pemasaran
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.047 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".