<scp>CO<sub>2</sub></scp> mobility control by small molecule thickeners during secondary and tertiary enhanced oil recovery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recently, polymer thickeners have been considered for CO 2 mobility control during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Despite that, the requirement of co‐solvents is a controversial challenge for the solution of high‐molecular weight thickeners in gases. This study is focused on small molecule thickeners for carbon dioxide EOR without adding co‐solvents. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) was used as a CO 2 ‐philic thickener in different low molecular weights. Cloud‐point pressure, relative viscosity, and interfacial tension (IFT) between intermediate crude oil and pure/thickened CO 2 were measured at reservoir conditions. Also, the impact of PDMS‐CO 2 thickener on gas mobility control was evaluated during the coreflooding experiments in secondary and tertiary modes. The experimental results show that PDMS caused an increase in relative viscosity up to 4.7‐fold and successfully thickened CO 2 . In addition, the minimum miscibility pressure of PDMS‐thickened CO 2 was lower than that of pure CO 2 , and miscible PDMS‐CO 2 thickener occurred at higher PDMS molecular weights. However, the gas breakthrough time can be considerably delayed if the PDMS‐thickened CO 2 was flooded directly, which increased the oil recovery factor between 6% to 15% during tertiary recovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".