MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100454204

Multiplicative functionals on ensembles of non-intersecting paths

2013· article· en· W3100454204 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMicrosoft ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMultiplicative functionFredholm determinantMathematicsAiry functionBrownian motionPoint processFredholm theoryPath integral formulationPartition (number theory)Fredholm integral equationPath (computing)Mathematical analysisStatistical physicsIntegral equationCombinatoricsPhysicsComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to develop a theory behind the occurrence of “path-integral” kernels in the study of extended determinantal point processes and non-intersecting line ensembles. Our first result shows how determinants involving such kernels arise naturally in studying ratios of partition functions and expectations of multiplicative functionals for ensembles of non-intersecting paths on weighted graphs. Our second result shows how Fredholm determinants with extended kernels (as arise in the study of extended determinantal point processes such as the Airy[subscript 2] process) are equal to Fredholm determinants with path-integral kernels. We also show how the second result applies to a number of examples including the stationary (GUE) Dyson Brownian motion, the Airy[subscript 2] process, the Pearcey process, the Airy[subscript 1] and Airy[subscript 2→1] processes, and Markov processes on partitions related to the zz-measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207