MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100565213

The Depth and Breadth of John Bell’s Physics

2001· article· en· W3100565213 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsQuantum field theoryQuantum mechanicsTheoretical physicsBell's theoremField (mathematics)Bell test experimentsMathematical physicsQuantumQuantum entanglementMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bell, whose families had lived in Northern Ireland for several generations. His middle name, Stewart, was the Scottish family name of his mother, and until he went to university he was called at home by that name. The family’s religion was Anglican (Church of Ireland), but no religious bias prevented friendships with the Catholic community. The Bell family was of the working class, not prosperous, but with a high evaluation of education. Although only John attended school beyond age 14, each of his two younger brothers advanced socially, largely by self-education, one to become a professor of electrical engineering in Canada and the other a successful businessman. By age 11 John, who read intensively at the public library, announced his intention to become a scientist. He performed very well on his entrance examination for secondary education, but the family could only afford to send him to the Belfast Technical High School, which – usefully for his later career – provided both academic and practical courses. Finishing the Technical School in 1944 at age 16, Bell found a job as a junior technical assistant in the Physics Department of the Queen’s University at Belfast, under the supervision of Prof. Karl Emeleus and Dr. Richard Sloane. They recognized his talent, loaned him

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.013
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207