Response of Submerged Structures by the Finite Element-Cum-Boundary Element Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A double asymptotic approximation based finite element-cum-boundary element approach for fluid-structure interaction problems is being proposed. In particular a staggered solution scheme has been applied to the analysis of various coupled fluid-structure systems. A stabilization scheme by reformulation, proposed by DeRuntz et al. was employed to circumvent the instability problem. In addition, the singularity in the excitation term was eliminated through a variable transformation as suggested by Everstine. Another feature of the present work is its incorporation of the hybrid strain based lower order triangular shell finite element developed by To and Liu. The eigenvalue solution exhibits high convergence rate for the particular shell finite element employed. The responses calculated exhibit the effectiveness of the proposed approach with application of the aforementioned shell finite element in dealing with three dimensional fluid-structure interaction problems. The reduction in problem size that this approach affords allows these complex interaction problems to be dealt with in a desktop engineering workstation environment, as opposed to the mainframe and supercomputer arenas where they have been implemented in the past.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".