Possible cardioprotective role of NaHS on ECG and oxidative stress markers in an unpredictable chronic mild stress model in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The protective effect of H2S against various body organ injuries has been described. The aim of this work is to investigate the potential role of sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS) as an H2S donor in chronic mild stress induced changes in the rat heart. Forty adult male Sprague Dawley rats were assigned to four groups: control, stressed group, stressed rats treated with aminooxyacetic acid (AOAA), and stressed rats treated with NaHS. Arterial blood pressure (ABP) was recorded. Serum adrenaline, MDA, and GSH levels were measured. Chronic stress significantly increased HR and ABP. AOAA produced similar changes, while NaHS mitigated the rise in HR and ABP. Both stressed and AOAA-treated stressed groups showed a significant decrease in QRS amplitude and a shortening of the RR, QT, and QTc intervals with an elevation of the ST segment. NaHS produced a significant improvement in ECG recordings. Chronic stress produced a significant rise of adrenaline and MDA levels with a significant decline in GSH levels. The AOAA-treated stressed group showed similar elevations. NaHS treatment caused significant reduction in adrenaline and MDA levels but significantly improved GSH levels. In conclusion, H2S donor has a cardioprotective effect against stress-induced cardiovascular diseases through amelioration of the oxidative stress and raised adrenaline levels induced by chronic stress exposure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".