MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3100853254 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038809

The LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey: Deep Fields Data Release 1

2020· article· en· W3100853254 on OpenAlexfundno aff
K. J. Duncan, R. Kondapally, M. J. I. Brown, Matteo Bonato, P. N. Best, H. J. A. Röttgering, M. Bondi, R. A. A. Bowler, R. K. Cochrane, G. Gürkan, M. J. Hardcastle, M. J. Jarvis, M. Kunert‐Bajraszewska, S. K. Leslie, K. Małek, L. K. Morabito, S. P. O’Sullivan, I. Prandoni, J. Sabater, T. W. Shimwell, D. J. B. Smith, Lingyu Wang, Aleksandra Wołowska, C. Tasse

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionInstitut national des sciences de l'UniversScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCanadian Space AgencyObservatoire de Paris, Université de Recherche Paris Sciences et LettresScience Mission DirectorateSmithsonian Astrophysical ObservatoryJet Propulsion LaboratoryEötvös Loránd TudományegyetemNational Central UniversityMax-Planck-GesellschaftNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekQueen's UniversityNational Science FoundationScience Foundation IrelandUniversity of California, Los AngelesUniversity of HertfordshireMinisterium für Innovation, Wissenschaft und Forschung des Landes Nordrhein-WestfalenCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationGordon and Betty Moore FoundationQueen's University BelfastNarodowym Centrum NaukiBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieUniversity of EdinburghCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversity of OxfordUniversité d'OrléansLeverhulme TrustNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDurham UniversityFP7 International CooperationSmithsonian InstitutionHintze Family Charitable FoundationSpace Telescope Science InstituteCalifornia Institute of TechnologyEuropean CommissionLos Alamos National LaboratoryJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsLOFARPhysicsRedshiftActive galactic nucleusAstrophysicsSkyGalaxyPhotometric redshiftPopulationQuasarHubble Deep FieldAstronomyRadio telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) Two-metre Sky Survey (LoTSS) is a sensitive, high-resolution 120-168 MHz survey split across multiple tiers over the northern sky. The first LoTSS Deep Fields data release consists of deep radio continuum imaging at 150 MHz of the Boötes, European Large Area Infrared Space Observatory Survey-North 1, and Lockman Hole fields, down to rms sensitivities of ~32, 20, and 22 μ Jy beam −1 , respectively. In this paper we present consistent photometric redshift (photo- z ) estimates for the optical source catalogues in all three fields – totalling over 7 million sources (~5 million after limiting to regions with the best photometric coverage). Our photo- z estimation uses a hybrid methodology that combines template fitting and machine learning and is optimised to produce the best possible performance for the radio continuum selected sources and the wider optical source population. Comparing our results with spectroscopic redshift samples, we find a robust scatter ranging from 1.6 to 2% for galaxies and 6.4 to 7% for identified optical, infrared, or X-ray selected active galactic nuclei. Our estimated outlier fractions (| z phot − z spec |/(1+ z spec )>0.15) for the corresponding subsets range from 1.5 to 1.8% and 18 to 22%, respectively. Replicating trends seen in analyses of previous wide-area radio surveys, we find no strong trend in photo- z quality as a function of radio luminosity for a fixed redshift. We exploit the broad wavelength coverage available within each field to produce galaxy stellar mass estimates for all optical sources at z < 1.5. Stellar mass functions derived for each field are used to validate our mass estimates, with the resulting estimates in good agreement between each field and with published results from the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207