Del Toboso al Barrio de las Letras: recreaciones de Dulcinea en María Velasco y Carolina África
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to explore how two contemporary playwrights, Carolina África and María Velasco, address Dulcinea’s character in a collective project called A siete pasos del Quijote. For this purpose, we will analyze their respective contributions, paying special attention to the modern way in which Africa and Velasco deal with one of the most important subjects in the Cervantes’s novel: the real world and the ideal world opposition through the duality between Aldonza and Dulcinea. From an interdisciplinary approach, which includes other artistic languages such as cinema and music, we also intend to establish a creative dialogue between the two playwrights and the inventor of the modern novel as well as other authors. At the same time, we will try to show some connections between the pieces studied in this paper and the rest of both playwrights’ works
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it