MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101046364 · doi:10.21608/zcom.2019.122622

The Impact of Employee Engagement on Turnover Intention; An Applied Study on The Egyptian Private Universities

2019· article· ar· W3101046364 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
نجلاء فرید حجازی

Bibliographic record

Venueمجلة البحوث التجارية · 2019
Typearticle
Languagear
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmployee engagementTurnover intentionTurnoverPsychologySocial psychologyPublic relationsBusiness administrationBusinessManagementPolitical scienceJob satisfactionEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study explores the relationships between Employee Engagement and turnover intention empirically in the higher education sector in Egypt. Based on a survey of academic staff in faculty of Al-Ahram Canadian University, 6th October University, and Masr University, it has been realized that all dimensions of Employee Engagement (vigor, dedication, and absorption) have positive effect on turnover intention. the research findings provide evidence to suggest that ;It is certain that the higher degree of Employee Engagement in terms of (vigor ,dedication , and absorption) will lead individuals to a lower level of turnover intention. It is necessary for organizations to consider the relationship between employee engagement and turnover intention in the formulation implementing and maintaining of their retention strategies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueمجلة البحوث التجاريةSame topicJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorFrench-language works237,207