MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101144112 · doi:10.1073/pnas.2013449117

Rox8 promotes microRNA-dependent <i>yki</i> messenger RNA decay

2020· article· en· W3101144112 on OpenAlexafffund
Xiaowei Guo, Yihao Sun, Taha Azad, Helena J. Janse van Rensburg, Jingjing Luo, Shuai Yang, Peng Liu, Zhongwei Lv, Meixiao Zhan, Ligong Lu, Yingqun Zhou, Xianjue Ma, Xiaoping Zhang, Xiaolong Yang, Lei Xue

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Cancer Society
KeywordsHippo signaling pathwaymicroRNAMessenger RNACarcinogenesisCell biologyRNA-binding proteinBiologyUntranslated regionRegulatorRNASuppressorDownregulation and upregulationThree prime untranslated regionSignal transductionGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Significance Dysregulation of the evolutionarily conserved Hippo pathway has been implicated in multiple diseases including cancer. Here we identified the RNA-binding protein (RBP) Rox8 as a regulator of Hippo signaling-mediated tumorigenesis. Rox8 not only directly binds to the 3′ UTR of yki mRNA, but also interacts with miR-8 to recruit miRNA-loaded RISC to degrade yki mRNA and therefore impedes Yki-induced tissue growth. We further revealed that TIAR, the human ortholog of Rox8, has retained a conserved regulatory function in yki / YAP mRNA stability. Our work uncovers a collaborative action of RBP and miRNA in regulating Hippo signaling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZFrench-language works237,207