MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101217599

Dynamical Behavior Near a Liquid-Liquid Phase Transition in Simulations of Supercooled Water

2011· article· en· W3101217599 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueWesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupercoolingLiquid liquidLiquid waterPhase transitionMaterials scienceLiquid phaseThermodynamicsPhase (matter)Chemical physicsCondensed matter physicsPhysicsChemistryChromatography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the behavior of the diffusion coefficient of the ST2 model of water over a broad region of the phase diagram via molecular dynamics simulations. The ST2 model has an accessible liquid-liquid transition between low-density and high-density phases, making the model an ideal candidate to explore the impacts of the liquid-liquid transition on dynamics. We locate characteristic dynamical loci in the phase diagram and compare them with the previously investigated thermodynamic loci. The low-density liquid phase shows a crossover from non-Arrhenius to Arrhenius behavior, signaling the onset of a crossover from fragile-to-strong behavior. We explain this crossover in terms of the asymptotic approach of the low-density liquid to a random tetrahedral network and show that the temperature dependence of the diffusion coefficient over a wide temperature range can be simply related to the concentration of defects in the network. Our findings thus confirm that the low-density phase of ST2 water is a well-defined metastable liquid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University)Same topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207