KINERJA BIDANG MITIGASI BENCANA ALAM KABUPATEN SUBANG
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana kinerja bidang mitigasi bencana alam di badan penanggulangan bencana daerah melalui kegiatan observasi lapangan. Penelitian ini mengacu pada pendapat Agus Dwiyanto (1995:9) menjelaskan bahwa pada kinerja organisasi terfokus pada aspek produktifitas, kualitas pelayanan, responsivitas, responsibilitas, dan akuntabilitas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah desriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penelitian diarahkan untuk membuat deskripsi, gambaran secara sistematis, faktual dan akurat mengenai fakta-fakta. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder dengan instrument penelitian menggunakan pedoman wawancara sebagai penuntun bagi peneliti untuk mengembangkan pertanyaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produktifitas yang berbicara tetang bagaimana pemberian pelayanan petugas kepada masyarakat, kualitas pelayanan berbicara pada kualitas sumber daya manusia yang dimiliki, responsivitas berbicara tentang kecepat tanggapan para petugas dalam pemberian pelayanan, responsibilitas berbicara tentang pertanggungjawaban individu dari petugas dan akuntablitas berbicara tentang pertanggungjawaban organisasi atau kelompok petugas. Pada intinya kinerja bidang mitigasi bencana alam di Badan Penanggulanga Bencana Daerah Kabupaten Subang belum optimal.
 
 The purpose of this study was to determine how the performance of the natural disaster mitigation field in the regional disaster management agency through field observation activities. This study refers to the opinion of Agus Dwiyanto (1995: 9) explaining that the organizational performance is focused on aspects of productivity, service quality, responsiveness, responsibility, and accountability. The research method used is descriptive qualitative approach. Research is directed to make a description, a systematic, factual and accurate description of the facts. The type of data used are primary and secondary data with research instruments using interview guidelines as a guide for researchers to develop questions. The results showed that productivity spoke about how the provision of service to officers to the community, quality of service spoke to the quality of human resources owned, responsiveness spoke of the speed of responses of officers in service delivery, responsibility spoke of individual accountability of officers and accountability spoke of organizational responsibility or group of officers. In essence, the performance of the field of natural disaster mitigation in the Subang District Disaster Management Agency is not yet optimal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it