MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101378732 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0908.0327

Diverse Broad Line Region Kinematic Signatures From Reverberation Mapping

2009· preprint· en· W3101378732 on OpenAlexaff
K. D. Denney, B. M. Peterson, Richard W. Pogge, Aaron Adair, D. W. Atlee, K. Au-Yong, Misty C. Bentz, Jonathan C. Bird, D. J. Brokofsky, Eric M. Chisholm, M. L. Comins, M. Dietrich, Victor Doroshenko, Jason D. Eastman, Y. S. Efimov, S. P. Ewald, S. Ferbey, C. M. Gaskell, C. H. Hedrick, Kelly Jackson, S. A. Klimanov, E. S. Klimek, Amanda Kruse, A. Ladéroute, J. B. Lamb, Karen M. Leighly, Takeo Minezaki, S. V. Nazarov, Christopher A. Onken, Eric Petersen, Paul E. Peterson, S. Poindexter, Yasushi Sakata, Katharine J. Schlesinger, С. Г. Сергеев, N. Skolski, Lauren Stieglitz, John Tobin, Cayman T. Unterborn, M. Vestergaard, A. E. Watkins, L. C. Watson, Y. Yoshii

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2009
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReverberation mappingPhysicsAstrophysicsReverberationObservatoryActive galactic nucleusLine (geometry)AstronomyKinematicsLuminosityEmission spectrumSpectral lineAcousticsGalaxyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed analysis of the data from a high sampling rate, multi-month reverberation mapping campaign, undertaken primarily at MDM Observatory with supporting observations from telescopes around the world, reveals that the Hbeta emission region within the broad line regions (BLRs) of several nearby AGNs exhibit a variety of kinematic behaviors. While the primary goal of this campaign was to obtain either new or improved Hbeta reverberation lag measurements for several relatively low luminosity AGNs (presented in a separate work), we were also able to unambiguously reconstruct velocity-resolved reverberation signals from a subset of our targets. Through high cadence spectroscopic monitoring of the optical continuum and broad Hbeta emission line variations observed in the nuclear regions of NGC 3227, NGC 3516, and NGC 5548, we clearly see evidence for outflowing, infalling, and virialized BLR gas motions, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.131 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207