MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3101420650 · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3467

Systematic velocity drifts of methanol masers associated with G9.62+0.20E

2020· article· en· W3101420650 on OpenAlexaff
Gordon MacLeod, James O. Chibueze, A. Sanna, J D Paulsen, Martin Houde, S. P. van den Heever, S. Goedhart

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsMaserPhysicsAstrophysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The source G9.62+0.20E surprises again! Several of the associated 6.7- and 12.2-GHz methanol masers are experiencing contemporaneous and systematic velocity drifts. Both 6.7- and 12.2-GHz methanol features blueward of v = +1.2 km s−1 are blue shifting while those redward are red shifting. A best-fitting rotating Keplerian disc with a central mass of ∼12 M⊙, radii Rinner = 5 au and Router = 5000 au, and at an inclination angle of 22○ either precessing and/or experiencing infall explains these systematic velocity drifts. Also three more distinct 6.7-GHz methanol maser features are found to vary periodically; two very weak and one obviously periodic only after 2003. Evidence of periodicity is seen as early as 1992. Time lags are confirmed but the cause is unclear. It is possible this source will surprise again.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→