Age-of-Information Aware Scheduling for Edge-Assisted Industrial Wireless Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Industrial wireless networks (IWNs) have attracted significant attention for providing time-critical delivery services, which can benefit from device-to-device (D2D) communication for low transmission delay. In this article, a distributed scheduling problem is investigated for D2D-enabled IWNs, where D2D links have various age-of-information (AoI) constraints for information freshness. This problem is formulated as a constrained optimization problem to optimize D2D packet delivery over limited spectrum resources, which is intractable since D2D users have no prior knowledge of the operating environment. To tackle this problem, in this article, an AoI-aware scheduling scheme is proposed based on primal-dual optimization and actor--critic reinforcement learning. In specific, multiple local actors for D2D devices learn AoI-aware scheduling policies to make on-site decisions with their stochastic AoI constraints addressed in the dual domain. An edge-based critic estimates the performance of all actors' decision-making policies from a global view, which can effectively address the nonstationary environment caused by concurrent learning of multiple local actors. Theoretical analysis on the convergence of learning is provided and simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".