An early Paleozoic silicic large igneous province in NE Gondwana: a preliminary synthesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five major oceans (Iapetus, Rheic, Proto-Tethys, Paleo-Tethys and Paleo-Asian) formed during or after assembly of the Gondwana continent. However, the relationship between them is poorly understood, largely due to the complex and disputed evolution of NE Gondwana in the early Paleozoic. Here we present a summary of early Paleozoic tectono-thermal events in the NE Gondwana and discuss their tectonic settings. Early Paleozoic magmatic rocks are widely distributed in the Himalaya, Lhasa, Southern Qiangtang, Baoshan, Sibumasu and Tengchong terranes, and their ages were loosely constrained to be ca. 530-430 Ma. However, after a critical review of these dating results, we propose the magmatic rocks were mostly formed between ca. 500-460 Ma. Although bimodal, they are dominated by granitoid rocks distributed over an area of >2500 km × 900 km. Thus, they constitute a typical silicic large igneous province. Almost all granitoid rocks were derived from partial melting of sedimentary rocks, but a few show A-type characteristics. Coeval amphibolite-facies metamorphic rocks yield ages of 490-465 Ma. A sedimentary hiatus marked by either a disconformity or angular unconformity coeval with the major magmatic flare-up period is evident in all terranes. Thus, present evidence doesn’t favor either the conventional Andean-type subduction model, in which these magmatic rocks reflect subduction of Proto-Tethys oceanic lithosphere beneath the northern Gondwanan margin, or a post-collision setting, in which extension is associated with the collapse of the Pan-African orogeny in NE Gondwana. The tectonic setting for this magmatic province is tentatively related to a plume in a far-field subduction zone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".