MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101611315 · doi:10.3917/rief.047.0053

Pratiques de soutien à la lecture et à l’écriture déployées par trois profils parentaux

2020· article· fr· W3101611315 on OpenAlexaff
Nancy Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueLa revue internationale de l éducation familiale · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il est reconnu que la lecture contribue au développement scolaire et social de l’individu. Qui plus est, le rôle du parent dans l’accompagnement et la découverte de la lecture par son enfant est sans contredit nécessaire. Bien que de nombreux parents présentent de faibles habiletés en lecture, cela ne devrait pas les freiner dans le partage de la lecture avec leur enfant. À partir d’une recension théorique, cette contribution présente les caractéristiques de trois profils parentaux (sous ou peu scolarisés, allophones sous ou peu scolarisés et, scolarisés, mais qui présentent un niveau de littératie inférieur à 3). Elle présente aussi l’accompagnement que les milieux scolaire, parascolaire et communautaire peuvent offrir aux parents afin que chacun contribue au développement des habiletés en lecture-écriture de son enfant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.666
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa revue internationale de l éducation familialeSame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207