MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3101646443 · doi:10.1049/iet-est.2020.0035

Online energy management of a hybrid fuel cell vehicle considering the performance variation of the power sources

2020· article· en· W3101646443 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electrical Systems in Transportation · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresQ & T ResearchUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVariation (astronomy)Fuel cellsAutomotive engineeringEnergy managementPower (physics)Hybrid powerHybrid vehicleEnergy (signal processing)EngineeringChemical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates the impact of battery and fuel cell (FC) degradation on energy management of a FC hybrid electric vehicle. In this respect, an online energy management strategy (EMS) is proposed considering simultaneous online adaptation of battery and FC models. The EMS is based on quadratic programming which is integrated into an online battery and proton exchange membrane FC (PEMFC) parameters identification. Considering the battery and PEMFC states of health, three scenarios have been considered for the EMS purpose, and the performance of the proposed EMS has been examined under two driving cycles. Numerous test scenarios using standard driving cycles reveal that the ageing of battery and PEMFC has a considerable impact on the hydrogen consumption. Moreover, the proposed EMS can successfully tackle the model uncertainties owing to the performance drifts of the power sources at the mentioned scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.229

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it